Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBOX vs RWMFX
LCBOX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts LCBOX vs RWMFX
LCBOX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBOX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBOX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LCBOX (9.31B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than LCBOX: RWMFX (1.41) vs LCBOX (1.28). LCBOX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: LCBOX (15 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). LCBOX (0.71) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LCBOX (30.00). LCBOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: LCBOX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. LCBOX (-1.52). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. LCBOX (7.74).
| LCBOX | RWMFX | LCBOX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.31 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.31 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.435 | 4.508 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.31B | 218B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 1.41 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.52 | 2.09 | -73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.69 | 30.24 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.74 | 27.39 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.55 | 82.36 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers