Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBOX vs RWMFX
LCBOX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts LCBOX vs RWMFX
LCBOX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBOX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBOX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LCBOX (9.28B). RWMFX (1.40) and LCBOX (1.36) have matching dividends . LCBOX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: LCBOX (15 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). LCBOX (0.71) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). LCBOX (30.00) and RWMFX (29.00) have comparable annual turnover. LCBOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: LCBOX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.11 vs. LCBOX (2.89). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.74 vs. LCBOX (11.11).
| LCBOX | RWMFX | LCBOX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.31 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.31 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.901 | 6.669 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.28B | 218B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.40 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.89 | 13.11 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.83 | 34.70 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.11 | 32.74 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.49 | 89.57 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement