Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBVX vs RMFCX
LCBVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LCBVX vs RMFCX
LCBVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LCBVX (2.41B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LCBVX: RMFCX (1.15) vs LCBVX (0.47). LCBVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LCBVX (13 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LCBVX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LCBVX (18.00). LCBVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LCBVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX (6.41) and LCBVX (6.35) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.44 vs. LCBVX (16.81).
| LCBVX | RMFCX | LCBVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.710 | 8.402 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.41B | 117B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.15 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.35 | 6.41 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.70 | 35.52 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.81 | 35.44 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.56 | 93.54 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement