Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBVX vs RMFCX
LCBVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LCBVX vs RMFCX
LCBVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBVX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LCBVX (2.32B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LCBVX: RMFCX (1.19) vs LCBVX (0.58). LCBVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LCBVX (12 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LCBVX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LCBVX (18.00). LCBVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LCBVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.29 vs. LCBVX (5.81). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.94 vs. LCBVX (10.04).
| LCBVX | RMFCX | LCBVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.180 | 6.340 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.32B | 117B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.19 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.81 | 9.29 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.67 | 34.47 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.04 | 33.94 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.31 | 93.22 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement