Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCEAX vs RMEBX
LCEAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCEAX vs RMEBX
LCEAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCEAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCEAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. LCEAX (10.3B). LCEAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LCEAX (1.19) vs RMEBX (1.04). LCEAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LCEAX (24 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LCEAX (0.83). LCEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCEAX: RMEBX (250) vs LCEAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.98 vs. LCEAX (5.03). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. LCEAX (-10.61).
| LCEAX | RMEBX | LCEAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.07 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.07 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.795 | 5.801 | 65% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 115B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.04 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.03 | 9.98 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.91 | 34.14 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.61 | 32.93 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.67 | 89.84 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement