Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCEAX vs RMFCX
LCEAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LCEAX vs RMFCX
LCEAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCEAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCEAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LCEAX (10.6B). RMFCX (1.15) and LCEAX (1.15) have matching dividends . LCEAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LCEAX (25 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LCEAX (0.83). LCEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCEAX: RMFCX (250) vs LCEAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.14 vs. LCEAX (4.85). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. LCEAX (-3.31).
| LCEAX | RMFCX | LCEAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.91 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.91 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.567 | 10.454 | 101% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 118B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.15 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.85 | 9.14 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.72 | 38.82 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.31 | 36.70 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.14 | 92.27 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers