Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCEAX vs RMFCX
LCEAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LCEAX vs RMFCX
LCEAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCEAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCEAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. LCEAX (10.3B). LCEAX (1.19) and RMFCX (1.19) have matching dividends . LCEAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LCEAX (24 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LCEAX (0.83). LCEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCEAX: RMFCX (250) vs LCEAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.10 vs. LCEAX (5.03). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. LCEAX (-10.61).
| LCEAX | RMFCX | LCEAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.91 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.91 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.795 | 5.845 | 65% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 115B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.19 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.03 | 10.10 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.91 | 34.65 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.61 | 33.85 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.67 | 91.46 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers