Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCEFX vs RMFCX
LCEFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LCEFX vs RMFCX
LCEFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCEFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCEFX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LCEFX (10.4B). LCEFX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LCEFX (1.44) vs RMFCX (1.15). LCEFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LCEFX (14 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LCEFX (0.47). LCEFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCEFX: RMFCX (250) vs LCEFX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.75 vs. LCEFX (1.81). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.61 vs. LCEFX (-1.81).
| LCEFX | RMFCX | LCEFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.91 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.91 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.224 | 8.539 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.4B | 117B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.15 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.81 | 4.75 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.65 | 35.38 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.81 | 35.61 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.14 | 94.16 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement