Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCFLX vs RMEBX
LCFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCFLX vs RMEBX
LCFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCFLX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LCFLX (164M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LCFLX: RMEBX (0.99) vs LCFLX (0.00). LCFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LCFLX (7 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). LCFLX (2.27) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LCFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCFLX: RMEBX (250) vs LCFLX (1500). LCFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.27 vs. RMEBX (8.96). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. LCFLX (-9.21).
| LCFLX | RMEBX | LCFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.07 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 1.07 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.793 | 9.416 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.99 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.27 | 8.96 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.81 | 32.63 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.21 | 36.13 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers