Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCFLX vs RMEBX
LCFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCFLX vs RMEBX
LCFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCFLX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. LCFLX (161M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LCFLX: RMEBX (0.99) vs LCFLX (0.00). LCFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LCFLX (7 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). LCFLX (2.27) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LCFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCFLX: RMEBX (250) vs LCFLX (1500). LCFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.91 vs. RMEBX (4.65). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. LCFLX (-11.06).
| LCFLX | RMEBX | LCFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.07 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 1.07 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.305 | 8.448 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.99 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.91 | 4.65 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.37 | 34.88 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.06 | 34.68 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement