Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCGFX vs RGACX
LCGFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LCGFX vs RGACX
LCGFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCGFX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCGFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. LCGFX (2.04B). LCGFX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . LCGFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LCGFX (26 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than LCGFX (0.75). LCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCGFX: RGACX (250) vs LCGFX (500000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.24 vs. LCGFX (10.13). LCGFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.90 vs. RGACX (22.53).
| LCGFX | RGACX | LCGFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.93 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.93 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.472 | 10.291 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 338B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.13 | 14.24 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.14 | 51.07 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.90 | 22.53 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 202.99 | 107.79 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers