Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCGFX vs RGACX
LCGFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LCGFX vs RGACX
LCGFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCGFX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCGFX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. LCGFX (1.9B). LCGFX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . LCGFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LCGFX (27 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than LCGFX (0.75). LCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCGFX: RGACX (250) vs LCGFX (500000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. LCGFX (4.07). LCGFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.14 vs. RGACX (13.23).
| LCGFX | RGACX | LCGFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.93 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.93 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.859 | 6.185 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.9B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.07 | 7.94 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.56 | 43.05 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.14 | 13.23 | 213% |
| Returns for 10 years | 201.12 | 107.97 | 186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement