Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCGFX vs RGAGX
LCGFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts LCGFX vs RGAGX
LCGFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCGFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCGFX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. LCGFX (1.9B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than LCGFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs LCGFX (0.00). LCGFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: LCGFX (27 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). LCGFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). LCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCGFX: RGAGX (250) vs LCGFX (500000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. LCGFX (4.07). LCGFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.14 vs. RGAGX (20.99).
| LCGFX | RGAGX | LCGFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.29 | 224% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.29 | 259% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.859 | 8.887 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.9B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.07 | 12.55 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.56 | 50.34 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.14 | 20.99 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 201.12 | 122.10 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement