Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCGNX vs RGACX
LCGNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LCGNX vs RGACX
LCGNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCGNX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCGNX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. LCGNX (1.88B). LCGNX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . LCGNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LCGNX (27 years) vs RGACX (24 years). LCGNX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). LCGNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCGNX: RGACX (250) vs LCGNX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. LCGNX (-1.76). LCGNX return over 5 years is better than : 20.70 vs. RGACX (13.46).
| LCGNX | RGACX | LCGNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.93 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.93 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.861 | 6.959 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.88B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.76 | 3.68 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.95 | 37.13 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.70 | 13.46 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 172.99 | 97.58 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement