Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCIAX vs RWEBX
LCIAX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCIAX vs RWEBX
LCIAX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCIAX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCIAX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LCIAX (1.91B). LCIAX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: LCIAX (1.05) vs RWEBX (0.75). LCIAX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LCIAX (24 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than LCIAX (0.13). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. LCIAX (16.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCIAX: RWEBX (250) vs LCIAX (100000). LCIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.58 vs. RWEBX (7.27). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.58 vs. LCIAX (0.34).
| LCIAX | RWEBX | LCIAX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.13 | 1.06 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.984 | 1.220 | 818% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 218B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.75 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.58 | 7.27 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.21 | 27.51 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.34 | 23.58 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.65 | 75.86 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement