Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCIAX vs RWMFX
LCIAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts LCIAX vs RWMFX
LCIAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCIAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCIAX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. LCIAX (1.91B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than LCIAX: RWMFX (1.40) vs LCIAX (1.05). LCIAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: LCIAX (24 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than LCIAX (0.13). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. LCIAX (16.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCIAX: RWMFX (250) vs LCIAX (100000). LCIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.58 vs. RWMFX (7.03). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.38 vs. LCIAX (0.34).
| LCIAX | RWMFX | LCIAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.31 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.13 | 0.31 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.984 | 1.322 | 755% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 218B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.40 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.58 | 7.03 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.21 | 30.20 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.34 | 26.38 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.65 | 82.33 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement