It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LCID’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLFUS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LCID’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFUS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
LCID (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +0.36% price change this week, while LFUS (@Electronic Components) price change was -3.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.31%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.24%.
LCID is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.
LFUS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.
Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
@Electronic Components (-0.33% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
LCID | LFUS | LCID / LFUS | |
Capitalization | 6.55B | 5.21B | 126% |
EBITDA | -2.57B | 325M | -790% |
Gain YTD | -8.278 | -10.350 | 80% |
P/E Ratio | 10.31 | 55.15 | 19% |
Revenue | 595M | 2.21B | 27% |
Total Cash | 3.86B | 620M | 623% |
Total Debt | 2.43B | 889M | 273% |
LFUS | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LCID | LFUS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago56% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago63% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago64% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago78% | 9 days ago63% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago86% | 2 days ago70% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago66% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago62% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
DAPP | 15.08 | 1.33 | +9.67% |
VanEck Digital Trfmt ETF | |||
RFEU | 67.00 | N/A | N/A |
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Eurp ETF | |||
TDTT | 24.07 | -0.04 | -0.17% |
FlexShares iBoxx 3Yr Target Dur TIPS ETF | |||
PML | 7.43 | -0.17 | -2.24% |
PIMCO Municipal Income FUND II | |||
TARK | 36.15 | -2.48 | -6.42% |
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LCID has been loosely correlated with RIVN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LCID jumps, then RIVN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LCID | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LCID | 100% | -6.42% | ||
RIVN - LCID | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.43% | ||
NIO - LCID | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
TSLA - LCID | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.68% | ||
GP - LCID | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.17% | ||
VWAGY - LCID | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.88% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFUS has been closely correlated with KN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LFUS jumps, then KN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LFUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LFUS | 100% | -2.51% | ||
KN - LFUS | 75% Closely correlated | -2.08% | ||
CTS - LFUS | 72% Closely correlated | -2.77% | ||
OLED - LFUS | 71% Closely correlated | -3.41% | ||
SANM - LFUS | 68% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
BELFB - LFUS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.17% | ||
More |