Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCLAX vs PEMGX
LCLAX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts LCLAX vs PEMGX
LCLAX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCLAX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCLAX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 23B vs. LCLAX (3.21B). LCLAX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . LCLAX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: LCLAX (13 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). LCLAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). LCLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). LCLAX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. LCLAX (1000) and PEMGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LCLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.75 vs. PEMGX (-16.32). LCLAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.72 vs. PEMGX (-6.04).
| LCLAX | PEMGX | LCLAX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.90 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.90 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.268 | -5.598 | -58% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.21B | 23B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.75 | -16.32 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.07 | 8.28 | 460% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.72 | -6.04 | -111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 306.64 | 72.36 | 424% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement