Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCLIX vs RMEBX
LCLIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCLIX vs RMEBX
LCLIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCLIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCLIX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LCLIX (2.52B). LCLIX (1.03) and RMEBX (1.00) have matching dividends . LCLIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LCLIX (13 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LCLIX (0.52). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LCLIX (18.00). LCLIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LCLIX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. LCLIX (8.22). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.43 vs. LCLIX (18.62).
| LCLIX | RMEBX | LCLIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 1.07 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 1.07 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.355 | 9.399 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.52B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.00 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.22 | 8.70 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.96 | 35.78 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.62 | 36.43 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.78 | 90.72 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement