Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCLIX vs RMFEX
LCLIX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LCLIX vs RMFEX
LCLIX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCLIX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCLIX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LCLIX (2.52B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LCLIX: RMFEX (1.42) vs LCLIX (1.03). LCLIX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LCLIX (13 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than LCLIX (0.52). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LCLIX (18.00). LCLIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LCLIX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.18 vs. LCLIX (8.22). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.55 vs. LCLIX (18.62).
| LCLIX | RMFEX | LCLIX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.62 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.62 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.355 | 9.643 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.52B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.42 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.22 | 9.18 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.96 | 37.63 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.62 | 39.55 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.78 | 100.63 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement