Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCMMX vs RGACX
LCMMX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LCMMX vs RGACX
LCMMX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCMMX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCMMX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. LCMMX (9.75B). LCMMX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . LCMMX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LCMMX (12 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than LCMMX (0.68). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LCMMX (22.00). LCMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: LCMMX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.13 vs. LCMMX (-5.28). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 8.33 vs. LCMMX (-4.30).
| LCMMX | RGACX | LCMMX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.93 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.93 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.051 | 3.589 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.75B | 357B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.28 | -1.13 | 466% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.54 | 32.42 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.30 | 8.33 | -52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.86 | 91.18 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement