Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCMMX vs RGAGX
LCMMX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts LCMMX vs RGAGX
LCMMX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCMMX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCMMX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. LCMMX (9.9B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than LCMMX: RGAGX (0.51) vs LCMMX (0.00). LCMMX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: LCMMX (12 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). LCMMX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LCMMX (22.00). LCMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: LCMMX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. LCMMX (1.45). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.99 vs. LCMMX (0.92).
| LCMMX | RGAGX | LCMMX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.29 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.29 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.967 | 8.887 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.9B | 361B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.45 | 12.55 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.09 | 50.34 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.92 | 20.99 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.88 | 122.10 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers