Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCMMX vs RGAGX
LCMMX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts LCMMX vs RGAGX
LCMMX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCMMX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCMMX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. LCMMX (10.6B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than LCMMX: RGAGX (0.51) vs LCMMX (0.00). LCMMX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: LCMMX (11 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). LCMMX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LCMMX (22.00). LCMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: LCMMX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.41 vs. LCMMX (4.25). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 27.14 vs. LCMMX (10.40).
| LCMMX | RGAGX | LCMMX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.29 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.29 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.684 | 10.599 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 338B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | 15.41 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.39 | 55.31 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.40 | 27.14 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.71 | 117.06 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers