WAT | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LCOW | WAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 67% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VOO | 702.35 | 1.49 | +0.21% |
| Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) | |||
| DDV | 24.96 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
| Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV) | |||
| FLGV | 19.43 | N/A | N/A |
| Franklin U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) | |||
| TPIF | 36.81 | -0.31 | -0.82% |
| Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) | |||
| RSIT | 21.49 | -0.23 | -1.06% |
| Return Stacked International Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSIT) | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that LCOW and MAS have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LCOW and MAS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LCOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCOW | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| MAS - LCOW | 19% Poorly correlated | +1.31% | ||
| AOS - LCOW | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
| SYF - LCOW | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.76% | ||
| NOW - LCOW | 14% Poorly correlated | +2.80% | ||
| WAT - LCOW | 14% Poorly correlated | -3.15% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WAT has been loosely correlated with A. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WAT jumps, then A could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAT | 100% | -3.15% | ||
| A - WAT | 66% Loosely correlated | -3.27% | ||
| RVTY - WAT | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.51% | ||
| TMO - WAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.34% | ||
| BRKR - WAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -4.34% | ||
| CRL - WAT | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.77% | ||
More | ||||