Ad is loading...
LCSSX vs PEMGX
LCSSX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts LCSSX vs PEMGX
LCSSX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCSSX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCSSX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 29.3B vs. LCSSX (3.6B). LCSSX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . LCSSX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: LCSSX (12 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). LCSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. PEMGX (10.10). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCSSX: PEMGX (1000) vs LCSSX (1000000). LCSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.13 vs. PEMGX (19.41). LCSSX return over 5 years is better than : 81.15 vs. PEMGX (38.39).
| LCSSX | PEMGX | LCSSX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.307 | 2.182 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.6B | 29.3B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.13 | 19.41 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.44 | 18.89 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.15 | 38.39 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 275.15 | 106.57 | 258% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...