Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCSSX vs PEMGX
LCSSX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts LCSSX vs PEMGX
LCSSX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCSSX vs. PEMGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCSSX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 30.8B vs. LCSSX (3.42B). LCSSX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . LCSSX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: LCSSX (13 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). LCSSX (0.98) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). LCSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCSSX: PEMGX (1000) vs LCSSX (1000000). LCSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.74 vs. PEMGX (-6.45). LCSSX return over 5 years is better than : 31.09 vs. PEMGX (25.57).
| LCSSX | PEMGX | LCSSX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.91 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.91 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.531 | -0.680 | -519% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.42B | 30.8B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.74 | -6.45 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.00 | 32.28 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.09 | 25.57 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 270.01 | 89.67 | 301% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers