Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCSSX vs PEMGX
LCSSX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts LCSSX vs PEMGX
LCSSX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCSSX vs. PEMGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCSSX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 21.3B vs. LCSSX (3.08B). LCSSX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . LCSSX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: LCSSX (14 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). LCSSX (0.99) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). LCSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCSSX: PEMGX (1000) vs LCSSX (1000000). LCSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.78 vs. PEMGX (-19.11). LCSSX return over 5 years is better than : 7.40 vs. PEMGX (-9.00).
| LCSSX | PEMGX | LCSSX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.90 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.90 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.531 | -8.102 | -31% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.08B | 21.3B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.78 | -19.11 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.61 | 9.32 | 479% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.40 | -9.00 | -82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 307.76 | 71.78 | 429% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers