Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCSSX vs PEMGX
LCSSX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts LCSSX vs PEMGX
LCSSX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCSSX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCSSX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. LCSSX (3.31B). LCSSX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . LCSSX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: LCSSX (14 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). LCSSX (0.99) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). LCSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCSSX: PEMGX (1000) vs LCSSX (1000000). LCSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.13 vs. PEMGX (-13.38). LCSSX return over 5 years is better than : 14.36 vs. PEMGX (-2.33).
| LCSSX | PEMGX | LCSSX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.90 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.90 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.674 | -4.297 | -132% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.31B | 23.7B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.13 | -13.38 | -91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.94 | 11.31 | 380% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.36 | -2.33 | -616% |
| Returns for 10 years | 336.64 | 77.19 | 436% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement