Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFOX vs RMEBX
LDFOX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LDFOX vs RMEBX
LDFOX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFOX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFOX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. LDFOX (2.15B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LDFOX: RMEBX (1.04) vs LDFOX (0.70). LDFOX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LDFOX (9 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LDFOX (0.63). LDFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LDFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LDFOX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LDFOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.38 vs. RMEBX (9.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. LDFOX (24.79).
| LDFOX | RMEBX | LDFOX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.475 | 5.801 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.15B | 115B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.04 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.38 | 9.98 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.31 | 34.14 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.79 | 32.93 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement