Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFVX vs RMEBX
LDFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LDFVX vs RMEBX
LDFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. LDFVX (2.15B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LDFVX: RMEBX (1.04) vs LDFVX (0.49). LDFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LDFVX (30 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LDFVX (0.93). LDFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LDFVX: RMEBX (250) vs LDFVX (1500). LDFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.96 vs. RMEBX (9.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. LDFVX (22.53).
| LDFVX | RMEBX | LDFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.07 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.07 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.366 | 5.801 | 58% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.15B | 115B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.04 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.96 | 9.98 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.60 | 34.14 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.53 | 32.93 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.33 | 89.84 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement