Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
LEAD vs RECS
LEAD vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts LEAD vs RECS
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF
Price$69.82
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$863
CapitalizationN/A
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$343.77K
CapitalizationN/A
LEAD vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEAD vs. RECS commentary
Nov 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEAD is a StrongBuy and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 1.41B vs. LEAD (59.4M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than LEAD: RECS (28.221) vs LEAD (15.563). LEAD was incepted earlier than RECS: LEAD (9 years) vs RECS (5 years). LEAD has a higher turnover RECS (45.00) vs RECS (45.00).
| LEAD | RECS | LEAD / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 15.563 | 28.221 | 55% |
| Net Assets | 59.4M | 1.41B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 53.66 | 45.00 | 119% |
| Yield | 1.04 | 0.89 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LEAD | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 69% | 8 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LEAD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEAD has been closely correlated with HUBB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEAD jumps, then HUBB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LEAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEAD | 100% | +1.22% | ||
| HUBB - LEAD | 69% Closely correlated | +2.45% | ||
| J - LEAD | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| LIN - LEAD | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| LW - LEAD | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| NVDA - LEAD | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -2.22% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.98% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +4.40% | ||
More | ||||