Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LEAD vs RECS
LEAD vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts LEAD vs RECS
LEAD vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEAD vs. RECS commentary
Jul 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEAD is a Hold and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 5.82B vs. LEAD (72.6M). LEAD has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: LEAD (13.732) vs RECS (6.685). LEAD was incepted earlier than RECS: LEAD (11 years) vs RECS (7 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than LEAD (0.43). RECS has a higher turnover LEAD (26.00) vs LEAD (26.00).
| LEAD | RECS | LEAD / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 13.732 | 6.685 | 205% |
| Net Assets | 72.6M | 5.82B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.15 | 287% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 32.00 | 81% |
| Yield | 0.55 | 0.75 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LEAD | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 70% | 1 day ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DAPR | 40.88 | -0.04 | -0.11% |
| FT Vest US Equity Dp Bffr ETF Apr | |||
| GCAL | 50.97 | -0.10 | -0.19% |
| Goldman Sachs Dynamic CA Muncpl Inc ETF | |||
| RBUF | 30.92 | -0.08 | -0.26% |
| Innovator U.S. Small Cp 10 Buf ETF - Qt | |||
| HYIN | 14.10 | -0.08 | -0.53% |
| WisdomTree Private Credit & Alt Inc | |||
| EWP | 58.80 | -1.02 | -1.71% |
| iShares MSCI Spain ETF | |||
LEAD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LEAD and SPGI have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LEAD and SPGI's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LEAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEAD | 100% | +0.33% | ||
| SPGI - LEAD | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.86% | ||
| TROW - LEAD | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ETN - LEAD | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.98% | ||
| TER - LEAD | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CGNX - LEAD | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.09% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.48% | ||
More | ||||