Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LEGCX vs RGACX
LEGCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LEGCX vs RGACX
LEGCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEGCX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEGCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. LEGCX (6.72B). LEGCX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . LEGCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LEGCX (24 years) vs RGACX (24 years). LEGCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). LEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEGCX: RGACX (250) vs LEGCX (2000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. LEGCX (3.46). LEGCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.28 vs. RGACX (13.46).
| LEGCX | RGACX | LEGCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.93 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.93 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.642 | 6.959 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.72B | 357B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.46 | 3.68 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.82 | 37.13 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.28 | 13.46 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.79 | 97.58 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement