Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LEGCX vs RGAFX
LEGCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts LEGCX vs RGAFX
LEGCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEGCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEGCX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. LEGCX (6.58B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than LEGCX: RGAFX (0.46) vs LEGCX (0.00). LEGCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: LEGCX (24 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). LEGCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). LEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEGCX: RGAFX (250) vs LEGCX (2000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.42 vs. LEGCX (-3.83). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.74 vs. LEGCX (9.44).
| LEGCX | RGAFX | LEGCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.34 | 506% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.34 | 506% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.282 | 9.276 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.58B | 353B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.83 | 0.42 | -916% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.42 | 44.36 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.44 | 14.74 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.36 | 109.80 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement