Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LEGCX vs RGAGX
LEGCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts LEGCX vs RGAGX
LEGCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEGCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEGCX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. LEGCX (6.72B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than LEGCX: RGAGX (0.51) vs LEGCX (0.00). LEGCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: LEGCX (24 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). LEGCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). LEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEGCX: RGAGX (250) vs LEGCX (2000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.75 vs. LEGCX (3.46). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.74 vs. LEGCX (14.28).
| LEGCX | RGAGX | LEGCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.642 | 7.335 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.72B | 357B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.46 | 4.75 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.82 | 41.00 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.28 | 17.74 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.79 | 106.44 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement