LEN
Price
$111.69
Change
+$1.06 (+0.96%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
47.28B
84 days until earnings call
SKHSF
Price
$20.84
Change
+$0.20 (+0.97%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
13.44B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LEN vs SKHSF

Header iconLEN vs SKHSF Comparison
Open Charts LEN vs SKHSFBanner chart's image
Lennar
Price$111.69
Change+$1.06 (+0.96%)
Volume$3.63M
Capitalization47.28B
Sekisui House
Price$20.84
Change+$0.20 (+0.97%)
Volume$44.66K
Capitalization13.44B
LEN vs SKHSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LEN vs. SKHSF commentary
Jun 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEN is a Hold and SKHSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 25, 2025
Stock price -- (LEN: $110.63 vs. SKHSF: $20.64)
Brand notoriety: LEN: Notable vs. SKHSF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Homebuilding industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LEN: 125% vs. SKHSF: 54%
Market capitalization -- LEN: $47.28B vs. SKHSF: $13.44B
LEN [@Homebuilding] is valued at $47.28B. SKHSF’s [@Homebuilding] market capitalization is $13.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Homebuilding] industry ranges from $53.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Homebuilding] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LEN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSKHSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LEN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SKHSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LEN is a better buy in the long-term than SKHSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LEN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LEN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

LEN (@Homebuilding) experienced а +1.04% price change this week, while SKHSF (@Homebuilding) price change was -0.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +4.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

LEN is expected to report earnings on Sep 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Homebuilding (+4.41% weekly)

Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LEN($47.3B) has a higher market cap than SKHSF($13.4B). LEN (11.78) and SKHSF (11.40) have similar P/E ratio . LEN YTD gains are higher at: -11.625 vs. SKHSF (-17.684). SKHSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 253B vs. LEN (5.65B). SKHSF has more cash in the bank: 303B vs. LEN (5.25B). LEN has less debt than SKHSF: LEN (4.4B) vs SKHSF (654B). SKHSF has higher revenues than LEN: SKHSF (2.89T) vs LEN (35.1B).
LENSKHSFLEN / SKHSF
Capitalization47.3B13.4B353%
EBITDA5.65B253B2%
Gain YTD-11.625-17.68466%
P/E Ratio11.7811.40103%
Revenue35.1B2.89T1%
Total Cash5.25B303B2%
Total Debt4.4B654B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LEN vs SKHSF: Fundamental Ratings
LEN
SKHSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
981
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5075
SMR RATING
1..100
5457
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6279
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6565
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SKHSF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as LEN (44) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that SKHSF’s stock grew similarly to LEN’s over the last 12 months.

LEN's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as SKHSF (75) in the null industry. This means that LEN’s stock grew similarly to SKHSF’s over the last 12 months.

LEN's SMR Rating (54) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as SKHSF (57) in the null industry. This means that LEN’s stock grew similarly to SKHSF’s over the last 12 months.

LEN's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as SKHSF (79) in the null industry. This means that LEN’s stock grew similarly to SKHSF’s over the last 12 months.

LEN's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as SKHSF (65) in the null industry. This means that LEN’s stock grew similarly to SKHSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PFBC85.293.94
+4.84%
Preferred Bank
RCL273.681.29
+0.47%
Royal Caribbean Group
CPA102.650.15
+0.15%
Copa Holdings SA
DLPN1.10N/A
N/A
Dolphin Entertainment Inc
NGS25.98-0.95
-3.53%
Natural Gas Services Group

LEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEN has been closely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEN jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEN
1D Price
Change %
LEN100%
+3.96%
PHM - LEN
92%
Closely correlated
+3.33%
DHI - LEN
90%
Closely correlated
+3.59%
KBH - LEN
88%
Closely correlated
+3.03%
MTH - LEN
87%
Closely correlated
+4.76%
TOL - LEN
86%
Closely correlated
+3.85%
More

SKHSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SKHSF has been loosely correlated with SKHSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SKHSF jumps, then SKHSY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKHSF
1D Price
Change %
SKHSF100%
-0.13%
SKHSY - SKHSF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
NVR - SKHSF
15%
Poorly correlated
+2.53%
LEN - SKHSF
15%
Poorly correlated
+3.96%
PHM - SKHSF
14%
Poorly correlated
+3.33%
DHI - SKHSF
13%
Poorly correlated
+3.59%
More