Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFFLX vs RMEBX
LFFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LFFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value F
Price$13.95
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.05M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.64
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.31B
LFFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFFLX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LFFLX (36M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LFFLX: RMEBX (1.16) vs LFFLX (0.76). LFFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LFFLX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LFFLX (1.49) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LFFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LFFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LFFLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LFFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. RMEBX (8.30). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 49.85 vs. LFFLX (1.40).
| LFFLX | RMEBX | LFFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.07 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.07 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.254 | 5.349 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.16 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.97 | 8.30 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.48 | 17.96 | -30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.40 | 49.85 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.21 | - |