Ad is loading...
LFFLX vs RMEBX
LFFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LFFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value F
Price$13.41
Change+$0.08 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.45M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.41
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.91B
LFFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFFLX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. LFFLX (33.4M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LFFLX: RMEBX (1.21) vs LFFLX (0.80). LFFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LFFLX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LFFLX (1.49) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LFFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LFFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LFFLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LFFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.44 vs. RMEBX (5.19). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.02 vs. LFFLX (17.33).
| LFFLX | RMEBX | LFFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.07 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.07 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.522 | 1.203 | -43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.4M | 101B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.21 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.44 | 5.19 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.07 | 16.77 | -24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.33 | 55.02 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 58.89 | - |