Ad is loading...
LFFLX vs RMEBX
LFFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LFFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value F
Price$12.66
Change+$0.08 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.58M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$52.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.51B
LFFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFFLX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 96.5B vs. LFFLX (32.6M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LFFLX: RMEBX (1.18) vs LFFLX (0.79). LFFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LFFLX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LFFLX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LFFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LFFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LFFLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LFFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.63 vs. RMEBX (3.48). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.73 vs. LFFLX (20.87).
| LFFLX | RMEBX | LFFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.07 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.07 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.522 | -3.381 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.6M | 96.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.18 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.63 | 3.48 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.48 | 5.34 | -290% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.87 | 47.73 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 51.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...