Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGAX vs RGAHX
LFGAX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts LFGAX vs RGAHX
LFGAX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGAX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGAX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. LFGAX (155M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than LFGAX: RGAHX (0.40) vs LFGAX (0.00). LFGAX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: LFGAX (8 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). LFGAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). LFGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LFGAX: RGAHX (250) vs LFGAX (1500). LFGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.23 vs. RGAHX (0.18). LFGAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.85 vs. RGAHX (13.78).
| LFGAX | RGAHX | LFGAX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.44 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.44 | 282% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.217 | 9.200 | 35% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.23 | 0.18 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.92 | 43.47 | 211% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.85 | 13.78 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 106.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers