Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGAX vs RGEBX
LFGAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts LFGAX vs RGEBX
LFGAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGAX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. LFGAX (169M). LFGAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . LFGAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: LFGAX (7 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). LFGAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). LFGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LFGAX: RGEBX (250) vs LFGAX (1500). LFGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.64 vs. RGEBX (3.42). LFGAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.00 vs. RGEBX (12.32).
| LFGAX | RGEBX | LFGAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.08 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.08 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.739 | 6.888 | 127% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.64 | 3.42 | 486% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.69 | 36.26 | 269% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.00 | 12.32 | 308% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement