Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGAX vs RGEBX
LFGAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts LFGAX vs RGEBX
LFGAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGAX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. LFGAX (170M). LFGAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . LFGAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: LFGAX (7 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). LFGAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). LFGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LFGAX: RGEBX (250) vs LFGAX (1500). LFGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.29 vs. RGEBX (11.13). LFGAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.36 vs. RGEBX (15.42).
| LFGAX | RGEBX | LFGAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.08 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.08 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.691 | 8.479 | 103% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.29 | 11.13 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 108.43 | 45.29 | 239% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.36 | 15.42 | 275% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 108.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement