Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGCX vs RGEBX
LFGCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts LFGCX vs RGEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth C
Price$39.15
Change+$0.35 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.1M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.68
Change+$0.55 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
LFGCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGCX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. LFGCX (154M). LFGCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . LFGCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: LFGCX (7 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). LFGCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). LFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LFGCX: RGEBX (250) vs LFGCX (1500). LFGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.44 vs. RGEBX (13.33). LFGCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.02 vs. RGEBX (34.12).
| LFGCX | RGEBX | LFGCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.09 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 1.09 | 202% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.204 | 14.334 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.44 | 13.33 | 281% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.36 | 50.00 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.02 | 34.12 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 88.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement