Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGFX vs RGAGX
LFGFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts LFGFX vs RGAGX
LFGFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGFX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. LFGFX (155M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than LFGFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs LFGFX (0.00). LFGFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: LFGFX (8 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). LFGFX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). LFGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). LFGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: LFGFX (0) vs RGAGX (250). LFGFX (0.50) and RGAGX (0.49) have marching annual gain over last year. LFGFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.58 vs. RGAGX (15.00).
| LFGFX | RGAGX | LFGFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.29 | 276% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.29 | 376% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.391 | 9.321 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.50 | 0.49 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.39 | 44.65 | 209% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.58 | 15.00 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 110.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers