Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGSX vs RGAGX
LFGSX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts LFGSX vs RGAGX
LFGSX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGSX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGSX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. LFGSX (170M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than LFGSX: RGAGX (0.51) vs LFGSX (0.00). LFGSX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: LFGSX (7 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). LFGSX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). LFGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). LFGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: LFGSX (0) vs RGAGX (250). LFGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.27 vs. RGAGX (12.55). LFGSX return over 5 years is better than : 42.38 vs. RGAGX (20.99).
| LFGSX | RGAGX | LFGSX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.29 | 362% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.29 | 428% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.687 | 8.887 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.27 | 12.55 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 108.52 | 50.34 | 216% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.38 | 20.99 | 202% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 122.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement