Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFMAX vs QMHNX
LFMAX vs QMHNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFMAX vs. QMHNX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFMAX is a Hold and QMHNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LFMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.53B vs. QMHNX (730M). LFMAX pays higher dividends than QMHNX: LFMAX (2.93) vs QMHNX (1.95). LFMAX was incepted earlier than QMHNX: LFMAX (14 years) vs QMHNX (12 years). QMHNX (4.28) is less costly to investors than LFMAX (2.13). QMHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 657.00 vs. LFMAX (90.00). LFMAX (2500) and QMHNX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. QMHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.73 vs. LFMAX (0.80). QMHNX return over 5 years is better than : 77.12 vs. LFMAX (3.18).
| LFMAX | QMHNX | LFMAX / QMHNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 4.12 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 4.28 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 7.820 | - |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 730M | 209% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 1.95 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.80 | 16.73 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.55 | 17.84 | -65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.18 | 77.12 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.36 | 19.09 | 59% |