Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFMAX vs QMHNX
LFMAX vs QMHNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFMAX vs. QMHNX commentary
Oct 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFMAX is a Hold and QMHNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LFMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. QMHNX (819M). LFMAX pays higher dividends than QMHNX: LFMAX (2.87) vs QMHNX (1.82). LFMAX was incepted earlier than QMHNX: LFMAX (15 years) vs QMHNX (12 years). QMHNX (4.28) is less costly to investors than LFMAX (2.13). QMHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 657.00 vs. LFMAX (90.00). LFMAX (2500) and QMHNX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. QMHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.52 vs. LFMAX (4.64). QMHNX return over 5 years is better than : 85.40 vs. LFMAX (7.37).
| LFMAX | QMHNX | LFMAX / QMHNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 4.12 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 4.28 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.880 | 15.166 | 19% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 819M | 189% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.87 | 1.82 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.64 | 22.52 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.72 | 17.46 | -73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.37 | 85.40 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.30 | 27.96 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement