Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFMAX vs QMHNX
LFMAX vs QMHNX Comparison
Open Charts LFMAX vs QMHNX
LFMAX vs QMHNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFMAX vs. QMHNX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFMAX is a Hold and QMHNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LFMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.7B vs. QMHNX (1.6B). LFMAX pays higher dividends than QMHNX: LFMAX (2.68) vs QMHNX (1.65). LFMAX was incepted earlier than QMHNX: LFMAX (15 years) vs QMHNX (13 years). QMHNX (4.68) is less costly to investors than LFMAX (2.00). QMHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 455.00 vs. LFMAX (62.00). LFMAX (2500) and QMHNX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. QMHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.39 vs. LFMAX (13.07). QMHNX return over 5 years is better than : 110.30 vs. LFMAX (7.86).
| LFMAX | QMHNX | LFMAX / QMHNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 4.67 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 4.68 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.804 | 15.237 | 58% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.7B | 1.6B | 106% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.68 | 1.65 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.07 | 32.39 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.14 | 54.10 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.86 | 110.30 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.45 | 62.74 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement