LFUS
Price
$260.80
Change
+$11.36 (+4.55%)
Updated
Nov 6 closing price
89 days until earnings call
PLXS
Price
$166.77
Change
+$15.15 (+9.99%)
Updated
Nov 6 closing price
76 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LFUS vs PLXS

Header iconLFUS vs PLXS Comparison
Open Charts LFUS vs PLXSBanner chart's image
Littelfuse
Price$260.80
Change+$11.36 (+4.55%)
Volume$179.24K
CapitalizationN/A
Plexus
Price$166.77
Change+$15.15 (+9.99%)
Volume$369.61K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
LFUS vs PLXS Comparison Chart
Loading...
LFUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
PLXS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
LFUS vs. PLXS commentary
Nov 07, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFUS is a StrongBuy and PLXS is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 07, 2024
Stock price -- (LFUS: $260.80 vs. PLXS: $166.77)
Brand notoriety: LFUS and PLXS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LFUS: 176% vs. PLXS: 241%
Market capitalization -- LFUS: $6.47B vs. PLXS: $4.54B
LFUS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $6.47B. PLXS’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $4.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $92.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LFUS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePLXS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LFUS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PLXS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LFUS is a better buy in the long-term than PLXS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LFUS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLXS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LFUS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PLXS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LFUS is a better buy in the short-term than PLXS.

Price Growth

LFUS (@Electronic Components) experienced а +3.79% price change this week, while PLXS (@Electronic Components) price change was +13.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

LFUS is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.

PLXS is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+2.13% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LFUS($6.47B) has a higher market cap than PLXS($4.54B). PLXS has higher P/E ratio than LFUS: PLXS (41.59) vs LFUS (33.52). PLXS YTD gains are higher at: 54.231 vs. LFUS (-1.770). LFUS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 426M vs. PLXS (239M). LFUS has more cash in the bank: 631M vs. PLXS (270M). PLXS has less debt than LFUS: PLXS (381M) vs LFUS (930M). PLXS has higher revenues than LFUS: PLXS (3.93B) vs LFUS (2.2B).
LFUSPLXSLFUS / PLXS
Capitalization6.47B4.54B143%
EBITDA426M239M178%
Gain YTD-1.77054.231-3%
P/E Ratio33.5241.5981%
Revenue2.2B3.93B56%
Total Cash631M270M234%
Total Debt930M381M244%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LFUS vs PLXS: Fundamental Ratings
LFUS
PLXS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
820
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4810
SMR RATING
1..100
7773
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5538
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1612
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LFUS's Valuation (27) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLXS (71) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLXS’s over the last 12 months.

PLXS's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFUS (48) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that PLXS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFUS’s over the last 12 months.

PLXS's SMR Rating (73) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LFUS (77) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that PLXS’s stock grew similarly to LFUS’s over the last 12 months.

PLXS's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LFUS (55) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that PLXS’s stock grew similarly to LFUS’s over the last 12 months.

PLXS's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LFUS (16) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that PLXS’s stock grew similarly to LFUS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LFUSPLXS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LFUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
PLXS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XDAT25.230.67
+2.72%
Franklin Exponential Data ETF
ESG138.073.36
+2.50%
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select ETF
URTH158.362.40
+1.54%
iShares MSCI World ETF
BEMB52.34-0.14
-0.26%
iShares J.P. Morgan Brd USD Emr MktBdETF
EWS21.46-0.22
-1.01%
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF

LFUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFUS has been loosely correlated with CTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LFUS jumps, then CTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFUS
1D Price
Change %
LFUS100%
+4.55%
CTS - LFUS
64%
Loosely correlated
+12.15%
PLXS - LFUS
60%
Loosely correlated
+9.99%
APH - LFUS
60%
Loosely correlated
+3.53%
KN - LFUS
60%
Loosely correlated
+8.65%
OLED - LFUS
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.79%
More

PLXS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLXS has been loosely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLXS jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLXS
1D Price
Change %
PLXS100%
+9.99%
BHE - PLXS
62%
Loosely correlated
+10.49%
LFUS - PLXS
62%
Loosely correlated
+4.55%
CTS - PLXS
61%
Loosely correlated
+12.15%
SANM - PLXS
60%
Loosely correlated
+12.69%
FLEX - PLXS
54%
Loosely correlated
+7.12%
More