Ad is loading...
LFUS
Price
$241.09
Change
-$8.21 (-3.29%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
78 days until earnings call
SGMA
Price
$2.67
Change
-$0.07 (-2.55%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
18 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LFUS vs SGMA

Header iconLFUS vs SGMA Comparison
Open Charts LFUS vs SGMABanner chart's image
Littelfuse
Price$241.09
Change-$8.21 (-3.29%)
Volume$128.6K
CapitalizationN/A
SigmaTron International
Price$2.67
Change-$0.07 (-2.55%)
Volume$85.54K
CapitalizationN/A
LFUS vs SGMA Comparison Chart
Loading...
LFUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SGMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LFUS vs. SGMA commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFUS is a Sell and SGMA is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (LFUS: $241.09 vs. SGMA: $2.67)
Brand notoriety: LFUS and SGMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LFUS: 130% vs. SGMA: 325%
Market capitalization -- LFUS: $5.98B vs. SGMA: $16.34M
LFUS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $5.98B. SGMA’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $16.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $88.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $5.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LFUS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSGMA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LFUS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SGMA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LFUS is a better buy in the long-term than SGMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LFUS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGMA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LFUS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SGMA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SGMA is a better buy in the short-term than LFUS.

Price Growth

LFUS (@Electronic Components) experienced а -6.49% price change this week, while SGMA (@Electronic Components) price change was -12.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -3.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

LFUS is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.

SGMA is expected to report earnings on Dec 06, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-3.72% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LFUS($5.98B) has a higher market cap than SGMA($16.3M). LFUS has higher P/E ratio than SGMA: LFUS (30.99) vs SGMA (2.87). LFUS YTD gains are higher at: -9.194 vs. SGMA (-11.296).
LFUSSGMALFUS / SGMA
Capitalization5.98B16.3M36,706%
EBITDA426MN/A-
Gain YTD-9.194-11.29681%
P/E Ratio30.992.871,079%
Revenue2.2BN/A-
Total Cash631MN/A-
Total Debt930MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LFUS vs SGMA: Fundamental Ratings
LFUS
SGMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56100
SMR RATING
1..100
7585
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6083
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2072
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LFUS's Valuation (25) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as SGMA (33) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew similarly to SGMA’s over the last 12 months.

LFUS's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGMA (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGMA’s over the last 12 months.

LFUS's SMR Rating (75) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as SGMA (85) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew similarly to SGMA’s over the last 12 months.

LFUS's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as SGMA (83) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew similarly to SGMA’s over the last 12 months.

LFUS's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGMA (72) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LFUSSGMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LFUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SGMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVRE44.310.14
+0.31%
Avantis Real Estate ETF
RITA20.32N/A
N/A
ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF
PSFD32.79-0.08
-0.24%
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF
URA30.30-0.10
-0.33%
Global X Uranium ETF
TMAT19.81-0.08
-0.41%
Main Thematic Innovation ETF

LFUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFUS has been loosely correlated with CTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LFUS jumps, then CTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFUS
1D Price
Change %
LFUS100%
-3.29%
CTS - LFUS
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
PLXS - LFUS
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
APH - LFUS
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.80%
KN - LFUS
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
OLED - LFUS
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
More

SGMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SGMA and LFUS have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGMA and LFUS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGMA
1D Price
Change %
SGMA100%
-2.55%
LFUS - SGMA
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.29%
CLS - SGMA
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
BHE - SGMA
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
MEI - SGMA
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.32%
OUST - SGMA
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.99%
More