Advertisement
LFUS vs VIRT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFUS is a StrongBuy and VIRT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LFUS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVIRT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LFUS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- VIRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LFUS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VIRT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LFUS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- VIRT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LFUS (@Electronic Components) experienced а +4.26% price change this week, while VIRT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +3.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.83%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +95.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
LFUS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.
VIRT is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (+3.80% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.19% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| LFUS | VIRT | LFUS / VIRT | |
| Capitalization | 5.55B | 1.84B | 302% |
| EBITDA | 325M | 1.05B | 31% |
| Gain YTD | -4.202 | 15.614 | -27% |
| P/E Ratio | 58.74 | 14.82 | 396% |
| Revenue | 2.21B | 2.29B | 96% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 820M | - |
| Total Debt | 889M | 5.13B | 17% |
LFUS | VIRT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
VIRT's Valuation (35) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LFUS (39) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that VIRT’s stock grew similarly to LFUS’s over the last 12 months.
VIRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LFUS (59) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that VIRT’s stock grew similarly to LFUS’s over the last 12 months.
VIRT's SMR Rating (40) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFUS (84) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that VIRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFUS’s over the last 12 months.
VIRT's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LFUS (51) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that VIRT’s stock grew similarly to LFUS’s over the last 12 months.
LFUS's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Electrical Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for VIRT (85) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that LFUS’s stock grew significantly faster than VIRT’s over the last 12 months.
| LFUS | VIRT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 1 day ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 6 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 1 day ago 68% |
Advertisement
LFUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFUS has been closely correlated with KN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LFUS jumps, then KN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LFUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFUS | 100% | -1.29% | ||
| KN - LFUS | 77% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| CTS - LFUS | 73% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| OLED - LFUS | 72% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| ROG - LFUS | 72% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| BELFB - LFUS | 69% Closely correlated | +4.37% | ||
More | ||||