Ad is loading...
LGCAX vs RWBEX
LGCAX vs RWBEX Comparison
Open Charts LGCAX vs RWBEX
Lord Abbett Global Equity A
Price$17.21
Change+$0.04 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets146.47M
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R2E
Price$64.72
Change+$0.19 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets124.44B
LGCAX vs RWBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGCAX vs. RWBEX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGCAX is a Buy and RWBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWBEX has more cash in the bank: 124B vs. LGCAX (146M). RWBEX pays higher dividends than LGCAX: RWBEX (1.18) vs LGCAX (0.41). LGCAX was incepted earlier than RWBEX: LGCAX (8 years) vs RWBEX (11 years). LGCAX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RWBEX (1.21). LGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RWBEX (27.00). RWBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGCAX: RWBEX (250) vs LGCAX (1500). LGCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.37 vs. RWBEX (1.80). LGCAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.97 vs. RWBEX (48.50).
| LGCAX | RWBEX | LGCAX / RWBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.21 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.21 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.185 | 2.486 | 128% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 146M | 124B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 1.18 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.37 | 1.80 | 577% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.98 | 29.46 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.97 | 48.50 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 38.57 | - |