Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGCAX vs RWIBX
LGCAX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts LGCAX vs RWIBX
LGCAX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGCAX vs. RWIBX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGCAX is a Buy and RWIBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. LGCAX (406M). RWIBX pays higher dividends than LGCAX: RWIBX (0.71) vs LGCAX (0.55). LGCAX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: LGCAX (10 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). RWIBX (1.51) is less costly to investors than LGCAX (1.04). LGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RWIBX (44.00). RWIBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGCAX: RWIBX (250) vs LGCAX (1500). LGCAX (16.14) and RWIBX (15.79) have marching annual gain over last year. LGCAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.40 vs. RWIBX (31.27).
| LGCAX | RWIBX | LGCAX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.51 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.51 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.450 | 17.374 | 72% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 406M | 156B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.71 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.14 | 15.79 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.33 | 49.11 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.40 | 31.27 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 88.85 | - |