Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGCAX vs RWIBX
LGCAX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts LGCAX vs RWIBX
LGCAX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the group is 78.19B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 389.97M to 155.99B. RWIBX holds the highest valuation in this group at 155.99B. The lowest valued company is LGCAX at 389.97M.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -1%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was 0%, and the average quarterly price growth was 13%. LGCAX experienced the highest price growth at -1%, while RWIBX experienced the biggest fall at -1%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
LGCAX vs. RWIBX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGCAX is a Buy and RWIBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. LGCAX (392M). RWIBX pays higher dividends than LGCAX: RWIBX (0.70) vs LGCAX (0.53). LGCAX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: LGCAX (10 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). RWIBX (1.51) is less costly to investors than LGCAX (1.04). LGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RWIBX (44.00). RWIBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGCAX: RWIBX (250) vs LGCAX (1500). LGCAX (14.98) and RWIBX (14.49) have marching annual gain over last year. LGCAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.74 vs. RWIBX (26.74).
| LGCAX | RWIBX | LGCAX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.51 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.51 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.910 | 15.131 | 65% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 392M | 156B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.70 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.98 | 14.49 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.40 | 46.08 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.74 | 26.74 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement