Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGCAX vs RWIBX
LGCAX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts LGCAX vs RWIBX
LGCAX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGCAX vs. RWIBX commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGCAX is a Hold and RWIBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. LGCAX (396M). RWIBX pays higher dividends than LGCAX: RWIBX (0.71) vs LGCAX (0.55). LGCAX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: LGCAX (9 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). RWIBX (1.51) is less costly to investors than LGCAX (1.04). LGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RWIBX (44.00). RWIBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGCAX: RWIBX (250) vs LGCAX (1500). LGCAX (15.36) and RWIBX (14.71) have marching annual gain over last year. LGCAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.85 vs. RWIBX (28.29).
| LGCAX | RWIBX | LGCAX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.51 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.51 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.470 | 13.774 | 54% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 396M | 160B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.71 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.36 | 14.71 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.80 | 44.76 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.85 | 28.29 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement