Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGCAX vs RWIBX
LGCAX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts LGCAX vs RWIBX
LGCAX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGCAX vs. RWIBX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGCAX is a Hold and RWIBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. LGCAX (392M). RWIBX pays higher dividends than LGCAX: RWIBX (0.71) vs LGCAX (0.55). LGCAX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: LGCAX (10 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). RWIBX (1.51) is less costly to investors than LGCAX (1.04). LGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RWIBX (44.00). RWIBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGCAX: RWIBX (250) vs LGCAX (1500). LGCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.89 vs. RWIBX (10.82). LGCAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.04 vs. RWIBX (26.20).
| LGCAX | RWIBX | LGCAX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.51 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.51 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.574 | 11.917 | 55% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 392M | 158B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.71 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.89 | 10.82 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.24 | 38.77 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.04 | 26.20 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement