Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGCCX vs RWIBX
LGCCX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts LGCCX vs RWIBX
LGCCX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGCCX vs. RWIBX commentary
Sep 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGCCX is a Buy and RWIBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. LGCCX (396M). RWIBX pays higher dividends than LGCCX: RWIBX (0.70) vs LGCCX (0.23). LGCCX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: LGCCX (10 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). LGCCX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RWIBX (1.51). LGCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RWIBX (44.00). RWIBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGCCX: RWIBX (250) vs LGCCX (1500). RWIBX (14.46) and LGCCX (14.34) have marching annual gain over last year. LGCCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.43 vs. RWIBX (27.92).
| LGCCX | RWIBX | LGCCX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.51 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.51 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.044 | 16.203 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 396M | 156B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.70 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.34 | 14.46 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.64 | 48.22 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.43 | 27.92 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement