Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGCFX vs WGIFX
LGCFX vs WGIFX Comparison
Open Charts LGCFX vs WGIFX
LGCFX vs WGIFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGCFX vs. WGIFX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGCFX is a Hold and WGIFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WGIFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. LGCFX (392M). WGIFX pays higher dividends than LGCFX: WGIFX (1.52) vs LGCFX (0.38). LGCFX was incepted earlier than WGIFX: LGCFX (9 years) vs WGIFX (18 years). LGCFX (0.89) is less costly to investors than WGIFX (0.52). LGCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. WGIFX (44.00). LGCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WGIFX: LGCFX (0) vs WGIFX (250). WGIFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.49 vs. LGCFX (18.84). LGCFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.37 vs. WGIFX (38.02).
| LGCFX | WGIFX | LGCFX / WGIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.52 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.52 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.189 | 15.519 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 392M | 160B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 1.52 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.84 | 21.49 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.20 | 50.79 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.37 | 38.02 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 107.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers