Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGCVX vs RWIBX
LGCVX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts LGCVX vs RWIBX
LGCVX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGCVX vs. RWIBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGCVX is a Hold and RWIBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. LGCVX (398M). RWIBX pays higher dividends than LGCVX: RWIBX (0.74) vs LGCVX (0.66). LGCVX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: LGCVX (9 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). RWIBX (1.51) is less costly to investors than LGCVX (0.79). LGCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RWIBX (44.00). LGCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWIBX: LGCVX (0) vs RWIBX (250). LGCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.63 vs. RWIBX (17.83). LGCVX return over 5 years is better than : 40.33 vs. RWIBX (27.84).
| LGCVX | RWIBX | LGCVX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.51 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.51 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.689 | 13.017 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 398M | 160B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.74 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.63 | 17.83 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.36 | 46.73 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.33 | 27.84 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement