LGDDF
Price
$22.00
Change
-$1.15 (-4.97%)
Updated
Dec 4 closing price
TNLIY
Price
$8.55
Change
+$0.41 (+5.04%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

LGDDF vs TNLIY

Header iconLGDDF vs TNLIY Comparison
Open Charts LGDDF vs TNLIYBanner chart's image
LAGARDERE SA
Price$22.00
Change-$1.15 (-4.97%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Trainline
Price$8.55
Change+$0.41 (+5.04%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
LGDDF vs TNLIY Comparison Chart
Loading...
LGDDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LGDDF vs. TNLIY commentary
Dec 24, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGDDF is a Sell and TNLIY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 24, 2024
Stock price -- (LGDDF: $22.00 vs. TNLIY: $8.55)
Brand notoriety: LGDDF and TNLIY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LGDDF: 24% vs. TNLIY: 100%
Market capitalization -- LGDDF: $3.24B vs. TNLIY: $1.63B
LGDDF [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $3.24B. TNLIY’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $1.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $121.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $9.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LGDDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTNLIY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LGDDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TNLIY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LGDDF is a better buy in the long-term than TNLIY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LGDDF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LGDDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

LGDDF (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TNLIY (@Other Consumer Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was +0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.76%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (+0.53% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LGDDF($3.24B) has a higher market cap than TNLIY($1.63B). TNLIY has higher P/E ratio than LGDDF: TNLIY (169.49) vs LGDDF (13.70). TNLIY YTD gains are higher at: 20.084 vs. LGDDF (9.589). LGDDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.11B vs. TNLIY (61.4M). LGDDF has more cash in the bank: 400M vs. TNLIY (74.9M). TNLIY has less debt than LGDDF: TNLIY (141M) vs LGDDF (4.44B). LGDDF has higher revenues than TNLIY: LGDDF (7.65B) vs TNLIY (276M).
LGDDFTNLIYLGDDF / TNLIY
Capitalization3.24B1.63B199%
EBITDA1.11B61.4M1,801%
Gain YTD9.58920.08448%
P/E Ratio13.70169.498%
Revenue7.65B276M2,772%
Total Cash400M74.9M534%
Total Debt4.44B141M3,150%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LGDDF: Fundamental Ratings
LGDDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LGDDFTNLIY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LGDDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FWMNX17.410.21
+1.22%
Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership I
OMSYX28.080.30
+1.08%
Invesco Main Street All Cap Y
GEGTX77.750.74
+0.96%
Columbia Large Cap Growth Inst
SBRVX14.920.13
+0.88%
Segall Bryant & Hamill Sm Cp Val Ret
BRZIX10.94-0.03
-0.27%
BlackRock Sus Adg Intl Eq Ins

LGDDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGDDF and WEBJF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGDDF and WEBJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGDDF
1D Price
Change %
LGDDF100%
N/A
WEBJF - LGDDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WOSSF - LGDDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSMNF - LGDDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TNLIY - LGDDF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TUIFF - LGDDF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TNLIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TNLIY and ONVC have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TNLIY and ONVC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNLIY
1D Price
Change %
TNLIY100%
N/A
ONVC - TNLIY
8%
Poorly correlated
-30.23%
TUIFF - TNLIY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WEBJF - TNLIY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WOSSF - TNLIY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSMNF - TNLIY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More