Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLAX vs RGAHX
LGLAX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts LGLAX vs RGAHX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$56.79
Change-$0.15 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.15B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$87.52
Change-$0.56 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
LGLAX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLAX vs. RGAHX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLAX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. LGLAX (8.15B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than LGLAX: RGAHX (0.45) vs LGLAX (0.00). LGLAX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: LGLAX (14 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). LGLAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: RGAHX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.61 vs. RGAHX (15.26). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 43.58 vs. LGLAX (28.24).
| LGLAX | RGAHX | LGLAX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.44 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.44 | 205% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.533 | 19.172 | 107% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.15B | 343B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.61 | 15.26 | 240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 119.76 | 75.27 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.24 | 43.58 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers