Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLAX vs RGAHX
LGLAX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts LGLAX vs RGAHX
LGLAX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLAX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLAX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. LGLAX (7.42B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than LGLAX: RGAHX (0.40) vs LGLAX (0.00). LGLAX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: LGLAX (15 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). LGLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: RGAHX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.18 vs. LGLAX (-1.75). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. LGLAX (11.67).
| LGLAX | RGAHX | LGLAX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.44 | 202% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.44 | 202% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.571 | 9.200 | 39% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.42B | 353B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.75 | 0.18 | -973% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.02 | 43.47 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.67 | 13.78 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.06 | 106.68 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement