Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLAX vs RGEBX
LGLAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts LGLAX vs RGEBX
LGLAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLAX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. LGLAX (7.42B). LGLAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . LGLAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: LGLAX (15 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than LGLAX (0.89). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: RGEBX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.77 vs. LGLAX (-1.75). LGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.67 vs. RGEBX (9.71).
| LGLAX | RGEBX | LGLAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.08 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.08 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.571 | 8.727 | 41% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.42B | 353B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.75 | -0.77 | 226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.02 | 39.77 | 214% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.67 | 9.71 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.06 | 97.58 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement