Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLRX vs RGAHX
LGLRX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts LGLRX vs RGAHX
LGLRX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLRX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLRX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. LGLRX (7.42B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than LGLRX: RGAHX (0.40) vs LGLRX (0.00). LGLRX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: LGLRX (15 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). LGLRX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). LGLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). LGLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: LGLRX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.18 vs. LGLRX (-2.08). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. LGLRX (9.43).
| LGLRX | RGAHX | LGLRX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.44 | 259% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.44 | 259% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.366 | 9.200 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.42B | 353B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.08 | 0.18 | -1,160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.46 | 43.47 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.43 | 13.78 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.32 | 106.68 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers