Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLRX vs RGEBX
LGLRX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts LGLRX vs RGEBX
LGLRX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLRX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLRX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. LGLRX (7.42B). LGLRX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . LGLRX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: LGLRX (15 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). LGLRX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). LGLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). LGLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: LGLRX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.77 vs. LGLRX (-2.08). RGEBX (9.71) and LGLRX (9.43) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LGLRX | RGEBX | LGLRX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.08 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.08 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.366 | 8.727 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.42B | 353B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.08 | -0.77 | 269% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.46 | 39.77 | 210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.43 | 9.71 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.32 | 97.58 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers