Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LGLRX vs RGEBX
LGLRX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts LGLRX vs RGEBX
LGLRX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LGLRX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LGLRX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. LGLRX (8.03B). LGLRX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . LGLRX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: LGLRX (15 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). LGLRX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). LGLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). LGLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: LGLRX (0) vs RGEBX (250). LGLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.74 vs. RGEBX (7.66). LGLRX return over 5 years is better than : 24.86 vs. RGEBX (12.07).
| LGLRX | RGEBX | LGLRX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.08 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.08 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.144 | 6.118 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.03B | 361B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.74 | 7.66 | 284% |
| Returns for 3 years | 99.08 | 42.13 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.86 | 12.07 | 206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.26 | 104.15 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement